Renewable Nukyular Power
This repeat offense features Dubya incorrectly asserting that nuclear power (which Dubya calls "nukyular power") is a renewable energy source. My guess is that 1) Dubya really believes this, or 2) he figures if he repeats this assertion enough times, people will start believing it.

1. We ought to be using nukyular power. It's a renewable source of energy. (Jun. 8, 2005)
2. We need to be — we ought to have more nukyular power in the United States of America. It's clean, it's renewable, it's safer than it ever was in the past. (Jan. 19, 2006)
3. If you're worried about the environment, which I am, it seems like to make sense that we use nukyular power. It's renewable and it's clean. (Feb. 2, 2006)
4. It's interesting when you think about a country like France, however. They have built 58 plants since the 1970s. They get 78 percent of their electricity from nukyular power. It's an interesting contrast, isn't it? We haven't done anything since the '70s. This country has decided to recognize the importance of having renewable sources of energy that protect the environment, and 78 percent of their electricity comes from this form of energy. (Feb. 20, 2006)
5. Obviously, nukyular power is a, uhh, renewable source of energy, and the less demand there is for non-renewable sources of energy, like fossil fuels, the better it off it is for the American people. (Mar. 2, 2006)
6. And nukyular energy is a — is a renewable source of energy in which there is zero greenhouse gases. (Mar. 3, 2006)
7. We need nukyular power, in my judgment. It's a renewable source of energy that doesn't create greenhouse gases. (Mar. 10, 2006)
8. I thought the prescription to the Kyoto plan was the wrong way to go. On the other hand, I do know we can use technologies to achieve exactly that objective. For example, second-generation nukyular power. It's a renewable resource. (Mar. 15, 2006)
9. I believe we ought to attack this issue on all fronts, on a variety of fronts. I know we ought to use nukyular power. It is a renewable source of energy that has got zero greenhouse gas effect. (Mar. 22, 2006)
10. On the electricity front, we need to be using nukyular power more in this country, in my judgment. It is a renewable source of energy that has zero gas emissions. (Mar. 29, 2006)
11. We got to be wise about our energy policy. I happen to believe in nukyular power. I believe nukyular power — I know nukyular power is renewable, and it protects the environment. (May 9, 2006)
12. Nukyular power is renewable, and nukyular power does not emit one greenhouse gas. (Dec. 20, 2006)
13. We need to be promoting nukyular power. If you're really interested in the environment, like a lot of people are, then we ought to be promoting a renewable source of energy that emits no greenhouse gases. (Jul. 10, 2007)
14. I mean, if you're concerned about global warming, one thing you ought to be concerned about then is making sure that we've got power generated from a clean source of energy — a renewable source of energy, which is nukyular power. (Jun. 6, 2008)
15. I really appreciate the Prime Minister's discussion about nukyular power. Prime Minister, we're trying to expand nukyular power here in the United States of America because it's clean, it's renewable, and it will help us become less dependent on hydrocarbons. (Jun. 18, 2008)
16. If one is really concerned about global warming and greenhouse gases, they ought to be carrying signs insisting upon the development of nukyular power plants. This is renewable energy with zero greenhouse gas emissions. (Jul. 4, 2008)
17. I'm a big believer in civilian nukyular power. I think it makes a lot of sense. People out there in the environmental community talk about the need for zero-emission, renewable fuel — there's one right there called nukyular power. And they ought to be supporting nukyular power. (Jul. 31, 2008)